This post deleted.

By Bug on February 25, 2008

Sorry.


The moon …

By Bug on February 20, 2008

One of Several


Good Geek Conversation (even if it was mostly with myself.)

By Bug on February 18, 2008

[5:46pm] bug_laptop: http://twitter.com/jknight - scroll down, its one of the last 10 or so
[5:56pm] slashmc: is the question over the calcuation of how bad you felt after watching 2 hrs of KR ?
[5:57pm] bug_laptop: haha
[5:57pm] bug_laptop: no
[5:57pm] bug_laptop: and i was wrong
[5:57pm] bug_laptop: but i’ll explain
[5:57pm] bug_laptop: at the end of the show, kitt stops and allows itself to be broadsided by a suburban
[5:57pm] bug_laptop: which immediately crumples against kitt, stopping virtually immediately
[5:58pm] bug_laptop: kitt never even budges
[5:58pm] slashmc: ah
[5:58pm] bug_laptop: so the question was, assuming the lack of magic, how much did kitt have to weigh to stop a moving suburban completely
[5:58pm] jbradley1: that is because when you weren’t looking kitt replaced himself with a giant chunk of lead
[5:58pm] hugbot: but that is a strange factoid, jbradley1
[5:58pm] bug_laptop: my assumptions were 100Km/h, Suburban weighs 6000lbs, or 2700 Kg
[5:58pm] jbradley1: he is a magical car after all
[5:58pm] hugbot: but he is in full psychotic rampage mode now, jbradley1
[5:59pm] bug_laptop: so last night, under the influence of wine, i used an F=ma calculation, and came up with 55000 pounds, assuming it took 3 seconds to dissipate the crash energy
[5:59pm] bug_laptop: but using a pure elastic collision based on momentum (m1v1 + m2v2)/m1 + m2
[5:59pm] lj left the chat room. (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
[6:00pm] bug_laptop: (m1v1 + m2v2)/(m1 + m2)
[6:00pm] slashmc: yeah, that’s not an elastic collision
[6:00pm] bug_laptop: but for the sake of the math
[6:00pm] bug_laptop: and m2v2 is 0
[6:00pm] bug_laptop: m1v1 is 72000 Kgm/s
[6:00pm] bug_laptop: m1 is 2700 kg
[6:01pm] bug_laptop: so m2 must be 69300 kg
[6:01pm] bug_laptop: converting to pounds, thats 160K
[6:01pm] bug_laptop: or 80 tons
[6:02pm] • slashmc will give it some thought just as soon as he can get the boss of this silly telecon
[6:02pm] bug_laptop: or about 12 tons more than an M1A2 main battle tank
[6:02pm] bug_laptop: also, about 78 tons more than a mustang
[6:02pm] bug_laptop: thats some magical nanotechnology
[6:03pm] slashmc: Kitt has to move a little bit
[6:04pm] slashmc: no matter how cool it is
[6:09pm] bug_laptop: well, yes, my calc. has final velocity at 1m/s
[6:09pm] bug_laptop: to make the math easy
[6:09pm] bug_laptop: and avoid divide by 0
[6:09pm] bug_laptop: interestingly, density of kitt at that moment, assuming that you just fill out the whole cube that kitt occupies, is only 5300 Kg/m3
[6:10pm] bug_laptop: about twice that of concrete, but only 2/3rds that of steel
[6:10pm] bug_laptop: and half that of lead
[6:10pm] bug_laptop: now, if you assume that kitt only takes up 2/3rds of the volume of the cube bounding its outer edges, then kitt basically transformed itself into a solid block of steel for the moment of collision
[6:11pm] bug_laptop: this conversation is getting posted on my blog shortly.
[6:11pm] hugbot: but this conversation is getting too politically incorrect, but I love it…, bug_laptop
[6:12pm] bug_laptop: if you assume that by VOLUME, KITT only takes up about 10% of the total space of the cube, and can’t transform air, then density jumps to 5 times that of lead
[6:12pm] bug_laptop: and 2.5 times the density of gold
[6:12pm] bug_laptop: sweet
[6:13pm] bug_laptop: not quite to neutron star yet, tho


More Windows Infuriation …

By Bug on February 13, 2008

Outlook--

Why can’t you just fix the problem? Or tell me where the file is you want me to delete? Or just not fucking SUCK.


@gruber re: MBA

By Bug on January 15, 2008

See John’s Comments here.

 

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the Air today, and discussing with those that make fun of me for my penchant for immediately purchasing newly minted Apple products, but …

 

I think the Air fits far more closely into the market described by Tim here, in that I really don’t care (when push comes to shove) about MBA v. MB v. MBP. I have an 8-core at work, a 4-core at home, both with terabytes of disk and gigabytes of RAM and gigapixels of screen real estate, and while I tried to make a clean break and use a warranty-voided 17″ MPB with a minor (320GB) HD upgrade as my “workstation” while pretending to be a manager in 2007, my heart lies with the three machine setup. Give me power at home, power at work and a little portable so I can be productive with a glass of wine on a beautiful Friday (Tuesday) afternoon (late morning (early morning)) at Smith & Wollensky near the office.

 

Its not about driving screen real estate, or CPU power, what I need is to be able to fullscreen my desktop over the network and make sure that THAT power is being used effectively. Plus check some email.

 

Note to Steve Jobs: WTF were you thinking not putting a SIM slot and 3G HSDPA or UMTS hardware in the Air?